Biestek V. Berryhill: The Misinterpretation
Presented by Meredith Marcus
and Karl Osterhout
Write your awesome label here.
Meredith and Karl explain and properly interpret the Supreme Court decision that "A vocational expert’s refusal to provide private market-survey data upon the applicant’s request does not categorically preclude the testimony from counting as “substantial evidence.”
Recorded on 10/2/2019
Recorded on 10/2/2019